ABSTRACT
To slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus, some U.S. State governments restricted public activity by implementing lockdowns. The possibility remains that lockdowns may need to be implemented in the future, whether to combat novel strains of COVID-19 or entirely different viruses. The present experiment tested whether thinking about a future lockdown affects people's attitudes toward institutions. We found that conservative participants who thought about a future lockdown reported less intention to adhere to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and less trust in the government compared to conservative participants in a control condition. We also found that liberal participants who thought about a future lockdown reported more trust in the government and the CDC, compared to liberal participants in a control condition. These findings suggest that merely considering a future lockdown affects people's intended adherence and institutional trust. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-04208-2.
ABSTRACT
To slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus, some U.S. State governments restricted public activity by implementing lockdowns. The possibility remains that lockdowns may need to be implemented in the future, whether to combat novel strains of COVID-19 or entirely different viruses. The present experiment tested whether thinking about a future lockdown affects people's attitudes toward institutions. We found that conservative participants who thought about a future lockdown reported less intention to adhere to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and less trust in the government compared to conservative participants in a control condition. We also found that liberal participants who thought about a future lockdown reported more trust in the government and the CDC, compared to liberal participants in a control condition. These findings suggest that merely considering a future lockdown affects people's intended adherence and institutional trust. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-022-04208-2.
ABSTRACT
Background: We have previously described AUTO1, a CD19 CAR with a fast off-rate CD19 binding domain, designed to reduce CAR T-cell immune toxicity and improve engraftment. Its clinical activity has been tested in r/r paediatric and adult B-ALL (Ghorashian S et al., Nat Med 2019;Roddie C et al., JCO 2021). This data confirms the intended function of the receptor, with low levels of CRS/ICANS and long-term engraftment of CAR T-cells observed in both patient groups. Aims: We have initiated testing of AUTO1 in the setting of B-NHL and CLL/SLL (NCT02935257). Methods: Manufacturing: CAR T-cell products were generated using a semi-automated closed process from non-mobilised patient leukapheresate. Study design: Subjects ≥ 16y underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30mg/m x3) and cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg x1) prior to AUTO1 infusion, with the exception of the DLBCL cohort who additionally received a single dose of pembrolizumab (200mg) on day -1 to potentiate CAR-T expansion. AUTO1 dose varies based on the indication. Split dosing of 230 x106 CD19 CAR T-cells at day 0 and day 9 is employed in the CLL cohort. A single dose of 200 x106 CD19 CAR T-cells is delivered to patients with B-NHL. Study endpoints include feasibility of manufacture, grade 3-5 toxicity and remission rates at 1 and 3 months. Results: As of 8th February 2022, we enrolled 23 patients: 11 low grade NHL (LG-NHL:7 with FL and 3 with MCL), 7 DLBCL and 5 CLL. Apheresis was successful in all 23 patients and product manufacture was successful in 22 (pending in the last). 19 patients were infused: 10 with LG-NHL, 6 with DLBCL and 3 with CLL. 1 CLL patient was pending infusion at time of data cut-off and 2 patients died pre-infusion: 1 MCL patient, from COVID-19 and 1 CLL patient, from intracerebral haemorrhage. Patients treated with AUTO1 had a median age of 60 years (range 39-79), had received a median of 3 prior lines of treatment (range 2-8). Grade 1 CRS was reported in 6/19 and Grade 2 CRS in 3/19. No ICANS was observed in the B-NHL and CLL cohorts. CAR engraftment was observed in 13/13 patients evaluated by qPCR with ongoing persistence in 12/13 patients at last follow-up. In the LG-NHL and DLBCL cohorts 10/10 and 4/5 evaluable patients respectively were in CMR by 18FDG PET-CT post-treatment. Responses were ongoing in 9/10 LG-NHL at 12 months and in 4/4 DLBCL at months 1, 3, 3 and 6. In the CLL cohort, 2/3 evaluable patients achieved MRD negative remission in the bone marrow with residual small volume lymph nodes by CT at 6 and 3 months of follow-up respectively. 1 CLL patient did not engraft and had SD at month 1. Summary/Conclusion: AUTO1 has a tolerable safety profile in patients with r/r B-NHL and CLL despite high disease burden. Early data shows excellent complete remission rates and excellent CAR engraftment/expansion. Additional patients, updated data and longer follow up will be presented.
ABSTRACT
In 2012, David Morgan gave a talk titled ‘Neighbours, neighbouring and acquaintanceship: some further thoughts’ at the University of Turku, Finland. In this article we engage in dialogue with Morgan’s talk, as well as his 2009 book Acquaintances, in particular the observations he made about the simultaneous closeness and distance that characterises neighbouring relationships. We suggest that using the metaphors of elasticity and stickiness instead allows us to explore neighbouring relationships as more than inhabiting a space between intimates and strangers (Morgan, 2009), but as textured and messy everyday relationalities. We consider also how the ‘stickiness’ of this relationship as well as the significance of its ‘elasticity’ are likely to have been heightened during COVID-19 lockdowns, which have altered the usual configurations of intimate and stranger relationships. In doing so, our aim is to contribute further to Morgan’s theorising of the nature of neighbouring as a specific form of acquaintanceship. © Policy Press 2022.